Amidu Cautions OSP on Ofori-Atta Case: Learn from History!

Former Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu, has entered the fray regarding the ongoing issues between Ken Ofori-Atta and the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP). Amidu is urging caution, drawing parallels to historical judicial events.

Amidu's Warning to OSP

Amidu's commentary references a past incident involving Chief Justice I.K. Abban and Justice G.E.K. Aikins. He suggests that Special Prosecutor Kissi Agyebeng should learn from this history, implying that mocking or belittling someone's health issues can have unforeseen consequences. The core of Amidu's message is about humility and careful consideration when using institutional power.

He highlights the alleged insensitive remarks by Chief Justice Abban towards Justice Aikins' prostate cancer, a disease Abban himself later succumbed to. Amidu uses this as a cautionary tale about wielding power without empathy.

OSP and Ofori-Atta: The Current Situation

The OSP has accused Ken Ofori-Atta of failing to provide medical documentation to support his reason for not appearing before them. Special Prosecutor Kissi Agyebeng expressed frustration and suggested Ofori-Atta was acting in bad faith. However, Ofori-Atta's legal team, led by Frank Davies, vehemently denies these claims, asserting that the medical report was indeed submitted to the OSP as part of court documents.

Key Points of Contention:

  • The OSP claims Ofori-Atta didn't submit medical documentation.
  • Ofori-Atta's legal team insists the documentation was submitted.
  • Amidu's intervention adds a layer of historical context and a call for caution.

The situation remains tense, with accusations and rebuttals flying between the OSP and Ofori-Atta's representatives. Amidu's cautionary advice adds a significant dimension to the public discourse surrounding the case, urging a reflection on the potential consequences of actions and words within the justice system.

Compartir artículo