Former US President Donald Trump has refuted reports suggesting he approved attack plans against Iran, escalating uncertainty amidst ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran. The Wall Street Journal's report, citing anonymous officials, claimed Trump had greenlit attack plans but delayed the final order, hoping Iran would halt its nuclear program.
Trump's Response and the 'Bunker Buster' Concern
Trump countered these claims via Truth Social, stating the Wall Street Journal had "No Idea" about his thoughts on Iran. However, a US official told Axios that Trump's decision hinges on the effectiveness of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) in destroying Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment site.
Fordow, built within a mountain near Tehran, is a prime target for Israel. While Israel lacks the necessary "bunker-buster bombs" and aircraft, the US possesses both. This raises questions about potential US involvement.
Debate Over GBU-57 Effectiveness
A US official revealed that Trump isn't convinced US intervention is necessary yet, adding, "We’re going to be ready to strike Iran… We want to be unnecessary." Internal debate within Trump's cabinet and Pentagon chiefs centers on the effectiveness of the GBU-57s, a massive 13.6-tonne bomb.
The situation remains fluid as Karoline Leavitt's press briefing highlighted, with questions heavily focused on the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump's statement included the crucial phrase "substantial chance of negotiations," suggesting a possible diplomatic path, according to correspondent David Blevins.
- Trump denies approving attack plans.
- Decision dependent on 'bunker buster' effectiveness.
- Internal debate on GBU-57 capabilities.
- Potential for negotiations hinted.
The next week, or possibly less, is going to be “very big,” according to Trump’s own words, leaving the world on edge concerning a potential shift in US foreign policy regarding Iran. South Africa and the rest of the world are watching closely.