Supreme Court Allows Terror Victims to Sue Palestinian Authority in US Courts
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that victims of terrorist attacks in Israel can sue the Palestinian Authority (PA) in U.S. courts. This ruling upholds a 2019 law, the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, which allows American victims of overseas terrorist attacks linked to Palestinian groups to seek damages in U.S. courts.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court, stated that the law does not violate the due process rights of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the PA. The court recognized the U.S. government's interest in holding accountable those who perpetrate acts of violence against U.S. nationals, even when those acts occur outside U.S. borders.
Background of the Case
The case stemmed from a series of deadly attacks in Israel, dating back to the Second Intifada. The central question before the Supreme Court was whether Congress had the authority to subject the PLO and the PA to the jurisdiction of federal courts, thereby allowing victims of these attacks to sue for damages.
One notable victim in the case was Ari Fuld, an American citizen who was fatally stabbed in 2018. Fuld's case, along with others, were brought under the Anti-Terrorism Act, which allows Americans to sue for damages caused by terrorism. A lower federal court had previously awarded victims over $650 million, a judgment later overturned by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Implications of the Ruling
This Supreme Court decision has significant implications for victims of terrorism and their families. It clarifies that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear claims against the PLO and PA if they are found to have provided material support to acts of terrorism. The 2019 law stipulates that paying terrorists convicted of attacks constitutes consent to U.S. jurisdiction.
The ruling emphasizes the U.S. government's commitment to protecting its citizens from terrorism, regardless of where the attacks occur. It also underscores Congress's authority to legislate on matters related to foreign policy and national security.
While this ruling provides a pathway for victims to seek justice and compensation, it also raises complex questions about international law and the relationship between the U.S., Israel, and the Palestinian territories.