USCIS Revives Controversial 'Neighborhood Checks' for Citizenship Applicants
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is bringing back a policy last seen during the George H.W. Bush administration: 'neighborhood checks' for individuals applying for U.S. citizenship. This involves personal investigations of applicants, a move outlined in a policy memo released this week.
According to the memo, USCIS will be resuming these investigations, citing section 335(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. These 'neighborhood checks' aim to gather information from various sources about the applicant's character and suitability for naturalization.
What Do 'Neighborhood Checks' Entail?
These investigations involve USCIS requesting information from naturalization applicants. This may include 'testimonial letters from neighbors, employers, co-workers, and business associates who know the alien and can provide substantiated information about the alien, including any of the requirements for naturalization.'
The revival of this policy raises concerns about potential biases and the impact on immigrant communities. Critics argue that these checks could lead to discriminatory practices and create an environment of fear and distrust.
The Context: Immigration Policy Shifts
This development comes amid broader discussions about immigration policy and enforcement in the United States. The original Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 championed welcoming immigrants who could contribute to the nation. The reintroduction of 'neighborhood checks' represents a shift in approach, focusing on scrutiny and investigation.
USCIS, an office within the Department of Homeland Security, oversees the nation's legal immigration processing. This policy change is likely to have a significant impact on the agency's operations and the experiences of those seeking U.S. citizenship.
It remains to be seen how these 'neighborhood checks' will be implemented in practice and what impact they will have on the naturalization process. The policy is already generating considerable debate among immigration advocates, legal experts, and the general public.