The recent execution of Mikal Mahdi in South Carolina has sparked controversy, with allegations that the firing squad deliberately missed his heart to prolong his suffering. This claim is now at the center of a legal battle as attorneys for Stephen Stanko, another death row inmate, challenge the state's execution methods.
Allegations of Cruel and Unusual Punishment
According to the Associated Press, Stanko initially chose firing squad as his method of execution but later switched to lethal injection after Mahdi's execution last month. Court documents quoted by the AP reveal that an expert for Stanko suggested the firing squad either aimed incorrectly or that the target wasn't properly placed on Mahdi's heart. The intent, it is alleged, was to inflict 'great pain before his death.'
Concerns Raised by Mahdi's Attorneys
Mahdi's legal team had already filed a complaint in May, arguing that his execution was botched. They hired Dr. Johnathan L. Arden, who concluded that the firing squad largely missed Mahdi's heart. Dr. Arden further asserted that Mahdi retained some circulation and was likely conscious for 30 to 60 seconds after being shot.
- Autopsy confirms firing squad missed the heart.
- Mahdi allegedly suffered an excruciating death.
- Concerns raised about the humanity of the execution.
David Weiss, Mahdi's attorney, stated, "Mikal suffered an excruciating death. We don't know what went wrong, but nothing about his execution was humane." He further emphasized the horrifying implications for others facing the same choice. The lawyers are calling on South Carolina to acknowledge their failures with executions.
Lethal Injection Also Under Scrutiny
Even though Stanko switched to lethal injection, his lawyers are challenging that method as well. They cite instances where previous executions left prisoners feeling like they were drowning. The lawyers have requested a delay in Stanko’s execution while these concerns are investigated.